Tibi, Bassam. Islam's Predicament with Modernity: Religious Reform and Cultural Change. (New York: Routledge, 2009)
_____
Political scientist Dr.
Bassam Tibi’s Islam’s Predicament with
Modernity: Religious Reform and Social Change (2009) is a sweeping,
in-depth study, the result of three decades of research. At four hundred pages
and printed in an unusually small font, its breadth and scope are difficult to
summarize succinctly. Nevertheless, it is topically highly relevant, as it
addresses the difficulties that Islam as a cultural system is facing in a “post
bi-polar world” from the perspective of Muslims themselves. Tibi is not only
joining the chorus of scholars rejecting the Clash of Civilizations thesis; he is also positing that,
cross-culturally, Islam truly does struggle with modernity, as any cursory
glance at the human rights records of majority Muslim countries will attest.
Provocatively, he rejects the idea of a homo
Islamicus, insisting it is unwise for Muslims to base their understanding
of human rights solely on a Muslim cultural footing. He dismisses the
“self-congratulating assurance” of contemporary Islamists as
“defensive-cultural apologetics,” stating that Islamism and Salafism are not
workable methods of achieving either a cultural renaissance or a cultural
resuscitation.[1] He
argues that there are two competing Islamist worldviews relating to Islam and
globalization: one premised around the history of jihad and crusade, in which
the present is viewed “in a defensive-cultural sense of self-victimization”
because “Western globalization replaced Islamic dominance”; and the other a
claim that Islam fell behind the West in terms of science and technological
development. Both, Tibi explains, are centered on a self-justifying “blame
game.”[2]
Tibi argues that Muslims can locate within their own history an Averroist
tradition of rationalism and humanism the predates and anticipates Western
spheres of church and state, and that these strains of thought must be
recaptured and adopted by Muslim cultures in order to resolve the problem of
“Islamic backwardness.” Thus, Tibi’s book is an argument that Muslims must seek
within their own heritage the basic humanist and rationalist principles to
bring needed civil rights and balance to their societies, giving them the
strength to compete globally.[3]
[1] 28.
[2] 175.
[3] There is some circularity and apparent contradiction in
Tibi’s reasoning here: on the one hand he rejects the idea of building an
understanding of human rights on Islamic principles and teachings alone; and on
the other hand he claims a medieval precedent within Islam itself that serves
as a model of contemporary human rights discourse and Enlightenment
rationalism. It seems that his biggest concern overall is to refute the
validity of specifically Islamist claims
to Islam as a whole.

No comments:
Post a Comment